The Role of Nonprofit Organizations in Compensating for Market Failure

The Role of Nonprofit Organizations in Compensating for Market FailureABSTRACT This paper reviews three social scientific accounts of the civil sectors role in society the government failure, contract failure, and voluntary failure theories. All three explain the role of nonprofit organizations as compensating for the markets failure to brook certain collective goods. This approach involves a radical misinterpretation of the underlying principles of civic sector organizations. An account is needed that explains their saving in terms of their prescriptive concerns, rather than explaining normative concerns in terms of their economy. I lay a foundation for much(prenominal) an account by examining (1) the self-understanding among civic sector organizations that they should be mission-driven, and (2) the implications of this self-understanding for the sector as a social economy. Whereas mission-drivenness calls attention to service-provision, resource-sharing, and open communication as the normative core of civic sector organizations, the notion of a social economy suggests a recirculation of money into channels where standard economic logic no longer holds. The key to the civic sectors role lies not in responses to market failure, solely in the short-circuiting of a money-driven capitalist economy. Three trends will shape the future of education around the world the revolution in information technologies, the crisis of the welfare state, and the globalization of a consumer capitalist economy. In the face of such powerful developments on a massive scale, philosophys efforts toward educating humanity (1) can seem both presumptuous and romantic presumptuous, because much of philosophy has given up global theorizing of sort ... ...n producers and consumers, or among consumers.(10) Jon Van Tils Mapping the Third Sector Voluntarism in a Changing loving Economy (Washington, D.C. Foundation Center, 1988) hints at this, but a communitarian emphasis on building habit s of the heart keeps Van Til from pursuing the normative implications of voluntarism for the communication that should characterize such organizations and their relations to the public.(11) Civic sector organizations are under tremendous pressure to bend their communicative capacities for the sake of sales, advertising, marketing, and public relations strategies whose primary objective is the forwarding and preservation of the organization itself. While such strategies are necessary, openness suffers when communication subserves these strategies rather than these strategies themselves submitting to tests for open communication.